MK_FTW posted:I have been a wrestling fan for over 11 years now going back to late 1997 watching WWF, then as the years rolled by, I started watching TNA back when it started in 2002 to this very day and I still watch the WWE shows Raw, ECW and Smackdown every week.
MK_FTW posted:And now that TNA is here in your words, how would you compare WWE to TNA? Because TNA has now got most of WCW's talent but with new talent on top of that, so does the WWE have what it takes to even be in the same league as TNA and the old WCW?, I mean yes the WWE has some amazing talent such as Even Bourne, Kofi Kingston, Rey Mysterio MVP and John Morrison just to name a few, but out of WCW, TNA and the WWE, which company would be better, especially when it comes down to passing the tourch? I am a huge WWE fan and a huge TNA fan, but I think that TNA, because it's fresh and got some amazing talent such as Amazing Red, AJ Styles Christopher Daniels, Suicide again just to name a few And lets not forget about the experienced wrestlers Kurt Angle, Booker T, Scott Steiner, Kevin Nash, Brother Devon, Brother Ray and Rino, where as the WWE only has Kane, Undertaker, Triple H and Shawn Michaels who are basically the only few experienced wrestlers left in the WWE. So which Company do you think is better? I say TNA
eviscerater posted:I started watching in 2005. The first Wrestling Event I ever saw was the great american bash 2005. I watch RAW and ECW everytime it's on (I don't get Smackdown! or Superstars) I watched TNA once. Never watched it again.
eviscerater posted:Yeah...he is. any reason for that post?