| Author |
Topic:
TNA vs. WWE vs. ROH vs. UFC
|
MasterShiraiRyu
Posts:
2,198
Registered:
Sep '05
|
Date Posted:
4/9 9:56am
Subject:
RE: TNA vs. WWE vs. ROH vs. UFC
|
|
fake, staged, predetermined, are all good words to describe it. but fake is shorter
-----signature-----
If we are all god's children what makes Jesus so special he got to die for our sins we just get to die
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
| Report Post
|
pepsiplunge
Posts:
51
Registered:
Apr '08
|
Date Posted:
4/10 1:45am
Subject:
RE: TNA vs. WWE vs. ROH vs. UFC
|
your comparing 4 different companies with different audiences. UFC is real, WWE has rubbish wrestlers, ROH has a hardcore fan base and TNA has a six-sided ring.
Still TNA is the best
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
| Report Post
|
supes2705
Posts:
51
Registered:
Mar '08
|
Date Posted:
4/10 7:17am
Subject:
RE: TNA vs. WWE vs. ROH vs. UFC
|
pepsiplunge posted: your comparing 4 different companies with different audiences. UFC is real, WWE has rubbish wrestlers, ROH has a hardcore fan base and TNA has a six-sided ring.
Still TNA is the best
No the latter 3 are pro wrestling companies where as the first one is an MMA company, thats the big difference, no matter which one has more support or what ring they use its still wrestling
-----signature-----
"THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE"
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
| Report Post
|
Jane-O
Posts:
11
Registered:
Apr '08
|
Date Posted:
4/10 9:26am
Subject:
RE: TNA vs. WWE vs. ROH vs. UFC
|
Fake is not a good word to describe it. Do you call stunt work fake? Do you call dancing fake? Ice skating? Skateboarding? None of them involve people actually hitting each other. They're all performance sports where what you do can be staged. But pro wrestling gets disrespected just because it looks like combat sports? That's clearly not right.
And... 'predetermined' isn't a good word to describe it either. In the normal way of things, only the win/loss result is predetermined. What actually happens during the match is decided during the match.
'Real' is a short word too. Should we use that because it's short? No, because it gives the impression to people that it's a combat sport. The same misleading quality applies to 'fake' too. Neither are appropriate.
Hehe, I can rly get pedantic about this kind of thing. That's just me tho I hate people disrespecting wrestling.
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
| Report Post
|
PhenomenalOne
Posts:
7
Registered:
Apr '08
|
Date Posted:
4/10 10:31am
Subject:
RE: TNA vs. WWE vs. ROH vs. UFC
- Date Edited:
4/10 10:33am (1 edits total)
Edited By:
PhenomenalOne
|
Jane-O posted: Fake is not a good word to describe it. Do you call stunt work fake? Do you call dancing fake? Ice skating? Skateboarding? None of them involve people actually hitting each other. They're all performance sports where what you do can be staged. But pro wrestling gets disrespected just because it looks like combat sports? That's clearly not right.
And... 'predetermined' isn't a good word to describe it either. In the normal way of things, only the win/loss result is predetermined. What actually happens during the match is decided during the match.
'Real' is a short word too. Should we use that because it's short? No, because it gives the impression to people that it's a combat sport. The same misleading quality applies to 'fake' too. Neither are appropriate.
Hehe, I can rly get pedantic about this kind of thing. That's just me tho I hate people disrespecting wrestling.
Very well put bro.
Fav Wrestling Company-TNA
Fav MMA Company-EliteXC(Elite Extreme Combat)
By the way..i love to see HHH,The Rock,John Cena,Batista step in the MMA world agenst my boi KIMBO SLICE!!!
they wouldent last a min.
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
| Report Post
|
MasterShiraiRyu
Posts:
2,198
Registered:
Sep '05
|
Date Posted:
4/10 1:05pm
Subject:
RE: TNA vs. WWE vs. ROH vs. UFC
|
Jane-O posted: Fake is not a good word to describe it. Do you call stunt work fake? Do you call dancing fake? Ice skating? Skateboarding? None of them involve people actually hitting each other. They're all performance sports where what you do can be staged. But pro wrestling gets disrespected just because it looks like combat sports? That's clearly not right.
And... 'predetermined' isn't a good word to describe it either. In the normal way of things, only the win/loss result is predetermined. What actually happens during the match is decided during the match.
'Real' is a short word too. Should we use that because it's short? No, because it gives the impression to people that it's a combat sport. The same misleading quality applies to 'fake' too. Neither are appropriate.
Hehe, I can rly get pedantic about this kind of thing. That's just me tho I hate people disrespecting wrestling.
i got a little secret for you. the stuff they do in the ring is decided before they come out. they hardly talk during the match. in some cases they have to change it due to injuries. and the ref even lets them know when the match is running long. know about wrestling i know fake is a negative word, i even know that some wrestlers get mad when you call it fake(which i would never do in front of one) but its short and it describes it fine.
-----signature-----
If we are all god's children what makes Jesus so special he got to die for our sins we just get to die
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
| Report Post
|
westlyside
Posts:
3
Registered:
Apr '08
|
Date Posted:
4/11 12:44pm
Subject:
RE: TNA vs. WWE vs. ROH vs. UFC
|
Timbo7 posted: TNA is my all time fav!!
THIS GUY SUCKS WWE IS BY FAR THE MUCH BETTER COMPANY
TNA IS FULL OF WWE REJECTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
| Report Post
|
MrDeath
Posts:
35
Registered:
Apr '08
|
Date Posted:
4/11 3:37pm
Subject:
RE: TNA vs. WWE vs. ROH vs. UFC
|
westlyside posted:
Timbo7 posted: TNA is my all time fav!!
THIS GUY SUCKS WWE IS BY FAR THE MUCH BETTER COMPANY
TNA IS FULL OF WWE REJECTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dude?! SHUT THE FUCK UP
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
| Report Post
|
MasterShiraiRyu
Posts:
2,198
Registered:
Sep '05
|
Date Posted:
4/11 3:51pm
Subject:
RE: TNA vs. WWE vs. ROH vs. UFC
|
|
take it easy death, no need for you to get banned cause of this dude. he is just a wwe mark so ignore him.
-----signature-----
If we are all god's children what makes Jesus so special he got to die for our sins we just get to die
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
| Report Post
|
TNA_TITAN
Posts:
43
Registered:
Mar '08
|
Date Posted:
4/12 3:49pm
Subject:
RE: TNA vs. WWE vs. ROH vs. UFC
|
|
Yeah. But obviously TNA is better than WWE, WWE fans just cant take taht WWE has been beaten
-----signature-----
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
| Report Post
|
pyrodude760
Posts:
70
Registered:
Apr '08
|
Date Posted:
4/14 9:37am
Subject:
RE: TNA vs. WWE vs. ROH vs. UFC
|
i think its between wwe's ecw and tna
but id have to say tna just because of sting
-----signature-----
Sting is the best wrestler of all time that never aird on the WWE WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
| Report Post
|
-InstantClassic
Posts:
8
Registered:
Apr '08
|
Date Posted:
4/14 11:53am
Subject:
RE: TNA vs. WWE vs. ROH vs. UFC
|
WWE and TNA.
I haven't watched RoH, but I would like to.
-----signature-----
Christian Cagw Rawks. RIP Eddie Guerrero.
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
| Report Post
|
Parxy
Posts:
29
Registered:
Apr '08
|
Date Posted:
4/14 2:34pm
Subject:
RE: TNA vs. WWE vs. ROH vs. UFC
|
Mmm as much as I want TNA to succeed I've got to admit that they really are sucking lately, especially with Lockdown, which I thought was a let down. Let's see if they can step it up a notch now they've got a new champion and TNA Impact! coming out this Summer.
UFC is MMA so that doesn't really count.
WWE is doing very good at the minute and Wrestlemania 24 was fantastic, although they still have some questionable tactics and put on duff matches.
ROH, therefore, wins it in my opinion. ROH really stepped up their game in 2006 during the CZW invasion angle and they've been excellent ever since. For people in the UK go to channel 427 on SKY and they're showing ROH re-runs from 2006...I highly recommend it.
No disrespect to any TNA fans, I mean they have the greatest potential, best roster, best match types and of course the six sided ring, they just need to ditch the crap stroylines and go back to doing what made them different in the first place...putting on awesome fast paced wrestling, having the greatest tag team of any promotion and putting on hardcore matches that the original ECW would look up to.
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
| Report Post
|
DragonJack13
Posts:
1,384
Registered:
Aug '06
|
Date Posted:
4/14 3:13pm
Subject:
RE: TNA vs. WWE vs. ROH vs. UFC
|
MasterShiraiRyu posted:
Jane-O posted: Fake is not a good word to describe it. Do you call stunt work fake? Do you call dancing fake? Ice skating? Skateboarding? None of them involve people actually hitting each other. They're all performance sports where what you do can be staged. But pro wrestling gets disrespected just because it looks like combat sports? That's clearly not right.
And... 'predetermined' isn't a good word to describe it either. In the normal way of things, only the win/loss result is predetermined. What actually happens during the match is decided during the match.
'Real' is a short word too. Should we use that because it's short? No, because it gives the impression to people that it's a combat sport. The same misleading quality applies to 'fake' too. Neither are appropriate.
Hehe, I can rly get pedantic about this kind of thing. That's just me tho I hate people disrespecting wrestling.
i got a little secret for you. the stuff they do in the ring is decided before they come out. they hardly talk during the match. in some cases they have to change it due to injuries. and the ref even lets them know when the match is running long. know about wrestling i know fake is a negative word, i even know that some wrestlers get mad when you call it fake(which i would never do in front of one) but its short and it describes it fine.
U've never taken a bump or done any type of training, have you? Anyway, I feel all of televised wrestling is unfortunetly going stale. But, if I had to chose, TNA, cause WWE has gotten down right ridiculous with some of the storylines.
-----signature-----
See you in your Nightmares
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
| Report Post
|
MasterShiraiRyu
Posts:
2,198
Registered:
Sep '05
|
Date Posted:
4/14 4:48pm
Subject:
RE: TNA vs. WWE vs. ROH vs. UFC
|
|
what part of my post made it seem that i never trained, or taken a bump. was it the use of the term fake. would staged be better for you people. or i can say the stories are fake but the bumps and slams and slaps and blood is real. no too long i'll stick with fake. also i trained for a year, competed in a show, injured my neck and will not compete agiain.
-----signature-----
If we are all god's children what makes Jesus so special he got to die for our sins we just get to die
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
| Report Post
|